Restaurant, food, and beverage companies target Hispanic and black children and teens with ads almost exclusively for fast food, candy, sugary drinks, and unhealthy snacks, according to a new report from the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity at the University of Connecticut, the Council on Black Health at Drexel University, and Salud America! at UT Health San Antonio.
The new report finds that fast food, candy, sugary drinks, and unhealthy snacks represented 86 percent of food ad spending on black-targeted TV programming, where black consumers comprise the majority of viewers, and 82 percent of ad spending on Spanish-language TV, in 2017. According to researchers, food companies spent almost $11 billion in total TV advertising in 2017, including $1.1 billion on advertising in black-targeted and Spanish-language TV programming.
“Food companies have introduced healthier products and established corporate responsibility programs to support health and wellness among their customers, but this study shows that they continue to spend 8 of 10 TV advertising dollars on fast food, candy, sugary drinks, and unhealthy snacks, with even more advertising for these products targeted to black and Hispanic youth,” said Jennifer Harris, PhD, the report’s lead author and the Rudd Center’s director of Marketing Initiatives.
Researchers also found that food companies increased their black-targeted TV ad spending by more than 50 percent from 2013 to 2017, even though their total advertising spending on all TV programming declined by 4 percent. Black teens saw more than twice as many ads for unhealthy products compared to white teens in 2017.
The report, “Increasing disparities in unhealthy food advertising targeted to Hispanic and black youth,” analyzed advertising by 32 major restaurant, food, and beverage companies that spent $100 million or more on food advertising to children (ages 2-11) and teens (ages 12-17) in 2017 and/or participated in the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI). The CFBAI is a voluntary, self-regulatory program that sets standards for food advertising directed to children under age 12.
Researchers examined TV ad spending by food companies, as well as young people’s exposure to this advertising, and identified brands targeting all children and teens and Hispanic and black consumers on Spanish-language and black-targeted TV programming. They compared these 2017 findings with data collected in 2013 from an earlier Rudd Center report on this topic. Researchers also examined companies’ public statements about their targeted marketing.
Companies Rarely Advertise Healthy Products
The report also found that advertising for healthier product categories—including 100 percent juice, water, nuts, and fruit—totaled only $195 million on all TV programming in 2017, a figure that represented 3 percent of their overall ad spending. Companies were even less likely to advertise these products to black consumers (representing just 1 percent of ad spending on black-targeted TV), and they were not advertised at all on Spanish-language TV.
“At best, these advertising patterns imply that food companies view black consumers as interested in candy, sugary drinks, fast food, and snacks with a lot of salt, fat, or sugar, but not in healthier foods,” said Shiriki Kumanyika, PhD, MPH, study author and chair of the Council on Black Health at Drexel University, Dornsife School of Public Health. “Not only are these companies missing out on a marketing opportunity, but they are inadvertently contributing to poor health in black communities by heavily promoting products linked to an increased risk of obesity, diabetes, and high blood pressure,” she said.
Study authors call on food manufacturers to stop disproportionately targeting black and Hispanic youth with ads for unhealthy food, expand corporate health and wellness commitments to promote marketing of healthier products to communities of color, and strengthen CFBAI standards to address targeted marketing of unhealthy products to all children and teens, including black and Hispanic youth.
“This report shows just how much the food and beverage industry values Hispanic consumers when it comes to encouraging them to buy unhealthy products. But if the industry really values these consumers, companies will take responsibility for advertising that encourages poor diet and related diseases. They can start by eliminating the marketing of unhealthy products to Hispanic youth and families,” said Amelie G. Ramirez, DrPH, MPH, study author and director of Salud America!, a national program to promote health equity based at the Institute for Health Promotion Research at UT Health San Antonio.
Other findings in the report include:
- Black children and teens each viewed an average of more than 16 food-related ads per day in 2017, compared to 8.8 ads-per-day for white children and 7.8 ads for white teens.
- Disparities in how many food-related TV ads black and white youth view are increasing. In 2013, black children and teens viewed 70 percent more food-related ads than their white peers. In 2017, these disparities grew to 86 percent more ads viewed by black children and 119 percent more for black teens compared to white children and teens.
- Candy brands, in particular, disproportionately advertised to Hispanic and black youth. Candy represented almost 20 percent of food-related TV ads viewed by Hispanic children and teens on Spanish-language TV. Black children and teens saw approximately 2.5 times as many candy ads as white children and teens.
- Companies with the most brands targeted to all youth and to black and/or Hispanic consumers of all ages included Mars (candy and gum brands), PepsiCo (snack and sugary drink brands), and Coca-Cola (sugary drink, diet soda, and drink mix brands).
- Fast food restaurants represented approximately one-half of all food-related TV advertising in 2017 (almost $4 billion), including advertising on black-targeted and Spanish-language TV programming.
Support for this research was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the view of the Foundation.
The full report can be found here.